<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Western Conference Draft Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ballerblogger.com/2009/06/29/2009-western-conference-draft-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ballerblogger.com/2009/06/29/2009-western-conference-draft-review/</link>
	<description>NBA blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday Bolts - 6.29.09 &#124; Daily Thunder.com - Where Thunder Happens</title>
		<link>http://ballerblogger.com/2009/06/29/2009-western-conference-draft-review/comment-page-1/#comment-27488</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Bolts - 6.29.09 &#124; Daily Thunder.com - Where Thunder Happens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballerblogger.com/?p=1425#comment-27488</guid>
		<description>[...] Ballerblogger reviews the draft: &#8220;The only reason I have a problem their draft is because they passed on Rubio. I don’t care if Russell Westbrook would be upset (lets be clear on this, Russell Westbrook is NOT a point guard). You have an amazing young core of athletes, and you’re going to bet on Westbrook developing point guard skills instead of drafting the prodigy point guard whose passing evokes comparisons to Maravich and Magic? I can’t be too mad though, because I think Harden fits really well there, and adds another nice piece to their core. Mullens is also a good pick at 24. He’s a longshot, but this is a guy who would’ve been a top 5 pick out of high school and has outrageous physical tools. In a draft that really only had 2 legit center prospects, the Thunder needed a center and got one of them. He may be a flop, but in a draft this weak, a talent like Mullens is certainly worth the risk.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ballerblogger reviews the draft: &#8220;The only reason I have a problem their draft is because they passed on Rubio. I don’t care if Russell Westbrook would be upset (lets be clear on this, Russell Westbrook is NOT a point guard). You have an amazing young core of athletes, and you’re going to bet on Westbrook developing point guard skills instead of drafting the prodigy point guard whose passing evokes comparisons to Maravich and Magic? I can’t be too mad though, because I think Harden fits really well there, and adds another nice piece to their core. Mullens is also a good pick at 24. He’s a longshot, but this is a guy who would’ve been a top 5 pick out of high school and has outrageous physical tools. In a draft that really only had 2 legit center prospects, the Thunder needed a center and got one of them. He may be a flop, but in a draft this weak, a talent like Mullens is certainly worth the risk.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

