Is Scottie Pippen a Hall of Famer?

» July 2, 2009 5:21 PM | By Brandon Hoffman

FOXSports.com’s NBA analyst Charley Rosen tackles that question and more in his latest mailbag. Here’s a snippet:

Pippen was an extraordinary team defender, but he was “only” a very good one-on-one defender. His ability to rotate, anticipate and provide judicious defensive help are very subtle endeavors that are beyond the ken of too many media folks.

He was an erratic 3-point shooter (32.6 percent lifetime) and could be counted on to force at least two trey attempts per game.

While Pippen was an empathetic and supportive teammate, he was frequently aloof, curt and unavailable to the media.

How often do second bananas get into the Hall of Fame? Especially since he only averaged 16.1 points per game for his career.

Most HOF voters are still unduly influenced by Pippen’s refusal to enter that infamous playoff game against the Knicks because Phil Jackson wanted him to be the inbounder and not the win-or-lose shot-taker. That’s why Pip has the undeserved reputation of being a selfish player.

There are plenty of “second bananas” in the Hall of Fame. Joe Dumars, who averaged 16.1 points with the Detroit Pistons, was enshrined in 2006. Not to mention Sam Jones, James Worthy, and Kevin McHale. Rosen questions Patrick Ewing and David Robinson HOF credentials, among others, and criticizes voters for focusing on numbers. Pippen’s career numbers are anything but stellar. However six rings, two gold medals, and multiple All-NBA and All-Defensive teams speak volumes. Pippen’s contributions deserve a space in Springfield.


2 Responses to “Is Scottie Pippen a Hall of Famer?”

  1. Robert BigWay Says:

    When did a players relationship with the media become a criterion by which a players HOF credentials are measured by. It is assinine to bring this up in a discussion of HOF credentials. The media is not part of the game, you just get to cover it, so get over yourselves.

    Pippen is more of a hall of famer than any Celtic of the Russell era, not named Russell or Cousey. He is probably somewhere around the 50th percentile of all the current HOF’ers. He was a singularly unique player, and Jordan wins zero titles without him.

  2. Yel Legaspi Says:

    I Agree with Robert. There is always that argument that Pip wouldn’t have won any rings without MJ, well I think that goes both ways.

Leave Your Comment